Get help from the best in academic writing.

The goal is to examine how social media affects our work lives.

themuse.com/advice/yes-you-can-get-fired-for-your-social-media-posts-9-times-people-learned-this-lesson-the-hard-way Choose one of the cases, or find a similar case online, and discuss the ethics involved.  Explain if the person posting on social media was feeling alienation or autonomy.  What would you have done in this situation and why?

Group Consulting Project: Disney

A brief description of the organization (external and internal analysis).2. Conclusion (briefly summarize the main results of the project report in three or four shortsentences. Then, you should give your point of view. Try to explain why some authors arewrong or right and what you think about the topic, but you have to base your own opinionon reasonable arguments. The conclusion should be no longer than one page).

Examine a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) advertising campaign that promotes the influenza (flu) vaccination.

Analyze the campaign to discover the target audience and the advertising techniques used. Then, evaluate the effectiveness of these advertising techniques. Write a five-paragraph essay in which you explain how the advertising campaign effectively promotes the influenza vaccination to a range of audiences.

Assignment: The Memo Package Assignment Scenario

Writing Assignment Help Wheaton. The memo should include at least two viable references no older than three years using APA 7 format and citation style. Put your references on their own page following your memo to Wheaton.Instructions for MEMO:•    Identify the country you selected for distribution of the software and why it is a viable market.•    Outline the research you conducted to identify the viable country and to learn how to communicate in writing to the potential distributor.•    Include the sources reviewed for your research in your memo to Wheaton, both using in-text citations and on a references page following the memo (sources must be no older than three years).•    Include information you gathered using a combination of summary, paraphrase, and limited direct quote from your sources.•    Explain the criteria and cultural considerations used to draft the letter.

Unit 2 Assignment The Letter Package

You will make up the name of the distributor, the company, the mailing address, and the contact person. Make certain your letter meets the cultural expectations of the country you selected based on your research. Research letter writing format expectations in your country of choice – business practices vary, so do your research!In your draft letter to the prospective distributor:•    Introduce yourself, your company, and your product to meet the cultural expectations of the country distributor (see useful resources provided below).•    Explain your interest in working with that distributor.•    Explain why the distributor will be interested in distributing your product.•    Demonstrate the cultural expectations relevant to the country you chose.

Analysis of Victor’s character in Shellwy’s Frankenstein novel.

How do his goals and plans change as the novel progresses? What thematic message/s do Victor’s changes reveal? Please include at least 4 quotes from the novel, a strong introduction with a clear thesis, 3 body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

(2) Present the argument from the CON essay in standard form.Ensure that:    (1) your arguments are in standard form    (2)

(2) Present the argument from the CON essay in standard form.Ensure that:    (1) your arguments are in standard form    (2) you are summarizing the arguments actually given in the essays    (3) you have the right conclusions for each argument    (4) your arguments are validthe passage :Is it OK to ride a crowded elevator one floor?ClarificationAssume that the elevator is in a tall building – say 20 stories. Assume that the elevator is packed with people who want to get to the fifth floor, the twelfth floor, the sixteenth floor, etc.. Assume that a set of stairs is close by and easily accessible. Assume that the would-be one-floor rider is able bodied and not carrying a heavy load. Is it morally permissible for her to get on at the first floor and get off at the second?ProOf course it’s permissible to take the elevator one floor. Everyone has an equal right to use the elevator, and you have that right whether you’re taking the elevator one floor or seventeen. Furthermore, even if many people in the elevator are delayed by the one-floor rider, they won’t be delayed for very long – maybe ten seconds. Anyone who is annoyed at being delayed ten seconds because of the reasonable actions of another person needs to (a) realize that she lives in a society, which is supposed to be a cooperative endeavor, and (b) reevaluate her priorities. The individual who is annoyed by a ten-second delay to her daily routine is someone who gets annoyed way too easily. Here’s one of the lessons: Just because someone’s actions irritate you, that doesn’t mean that she has done anything wrong. Maybe you are at fault for being irritated in the first place. Given the very minimal inconvenience involved in the elevator case, we should say that the one-floor rider is just fine and that anyone on the elevator who is bothered needs to learn to relax.ConMost of the possible moral transgressions discussed in this book are not terribly evil. Nobody would compare riding a crowded elevator one floor with murder. The severity of the wrongness is not the issue here. Rather, the issue is whether there is anything wrong with riding the elevator one floor. And there is. When you could easily take the stairs but instead inconvenience many other people, you’re putting the well-being of one person – you – above the well-being of many. It is almost always wrong to place more importance on one person’s well-being than the well-being of many, and when the one person is the actor, the one’s actions are also selfish. To ride a crowded elevator one floor is to announce to your fellow humans that you just don’t care about them that much. Either you have given the matter some thought andhave decided that you’re more important than everyone else, or you have never even thought about the way your actions might inconvenience others. It’s hard to say which is worse.But what about the idea that everyone has an equal right to use the elevator? The problem with this defense is that it relies on a bizarre notion of what a right is. First, note that the whole question is just whether everyone – including the one-floor rider – has an equal right to ride the elevator. My claim is that it is false that everyone has the right, and I have argued for this claim. Hence just saying, “But everyone has an equal right to use the elevator” is very much like saying “Nuh-uh!” or “”You’re wrong,” and that’s not an argument. Second, saying that you have a right to something as trivial as riding an elevator makes a mockery of the whole idea of rights. Let’s see, I have the right to life, the right to autonomy, and . . . the right to ride an elevator. Saying that you have a right to ride an elevator is like saying that you have a right to a good hair day. If talk of rights is to make any sense at all, and if rights are to be morally relevant, then they have to be special. There’s not much difference between thinking you have a right to just about everything and thinking you have no rights at all. The whole point of rights is that certain things are special and must be protected because they are more important than other things, which are not so special. Once people claim the right to ride an elevator, the distinction between the important things and the not-so-important things is lost. So, no, you don’t have a right to ride an elevator. Furthermore, the one-floor rider needlessly inconveniences others. Pretty clearly, then, the one-floor rider acts immorally.the arguments should be like a series of statements, one of which – the conclusion – is supposed to be supportedby the other statements – the premises.arguments in standard form- state the premises separately, draw a line, and then state the conclusion. if you like, numberthe premises and conclusion so that particular statements can easily be referred to by theirnumbers.an argument is sound if and only if:- it is valid.- it has all true premises.- an argument is valid if and only if:- if the premises were true, the conclusion would have to be true.OR- it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.(these two definitions are equivalent.)important: these definitions do not say that a valid argument has to have true premises.arguments shapes you can use:1: (1) H is an X.(2) All Xs are Ys._________________(3) H is a Y.2: (1) If X then Y(2) X_______________(3) Y3: (1) If X then Y(2) Not Y_______________(3) Not X4: If A then BB_____________Therefore, Aexample:If Betty got an A on every assignment, then she got an A for the course. She got an A for thecourse, so she must have gotten an A on every assignment.no need for citation