Get help from the best in academic writing.

Logistics And Physical Distribution Management For Food Leftover Sharing Writing Essay Help


Food scraps contribute significantly to landfill garbage. They originate primarily from grocery stores with unsold stock of perishable food that is either sold at a discount or expires and is discarded (Pearson and Perera, 2018). It is estimated that 160 billion pounds of food are discarded annually in North America and the United Kingdom (UK) (Swinburne and Sandson, 2019). When these organic materials are disposed of in landfills, they combine with other waste and decay in a manner that pollutes the environment (Scott and Vallen, 2019; De Medina-Salas et al., 2019). For instance, the decomposition process releases methane, which contributes to climate change by increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (Longjan and Dehouche, 2018; Achinas and Euverink, 2019; Wang and Stanisavljevic, 2019). Therefore, improper waste management is an economic and environmental hazard.

Retailers have been obliged to come up with creative solutions to the food waste problem. Some of them have given refrigerators for the storage of unsold goods, while others gather and donate surplus vegetables (Grosso and Falasconi, 2018). Governments have also been involved in the collection and distribution of food from shops to those in need. These solutions have been lauded as effective trash management measures (Baron et al., 2018). However, recent technological advancements have enabled the deployment of software (apps) to control the food waste crisis. The majority of these innovations are founded on the idea of the sharing economy, which optimizes resources for enhanced value production.

This document investigates the logistical and physical distribution management for food leftover sharing in the sharing economy using the Canadian food-sharing app "Flashfood" as an example. The app was created to prevent food waste by allowing consumers to purchase near-expiration foods at a discount. At the time of its founding, the company was operating in only a few Canadian regions, but it has since expanded to encompass the entire country (Martinko, 2020). It allows consumers to pay for their meals via the app and pick it up from actual distribution points. According to Martinko (2020), the Flashfood App has saved the landfill disposal of up to 50,000 pounds of food. This approach is consistent with the company's aim to eliminate food waste and feed the population (Flashfood Inc., 2019). It employs a sharing economy model to accomplish this purpose.

By reducing its supply chain to ensure clients obtain fresh supplies, Flashfood has enabled consumers to save money on grocery purchases since its implementation. This method is consistent with the economic concepts underlying the sharing economy, which favor lean systems (Muoz and Cohen, 2018). Enhanced procurement and operational procedures have strengthened the supply chain system's responsiveness to market demands. This paper examines Flashfood's logistics and physical distribution operations by examining two essential areas of its supply chain operations: distribution management and logistics information systems. The data unearthed will shed light on some of its most pressing logistical and distribution issues in order to identify potential remedies.

Food Waste Distribution Logistics Network

Detailed Product Category

The Flashfood application bundles nearly-expired food items and sells them at a discount. The majority of the company's products are perishable and must be refrigerated or consumed quickly. Yogurts, pasta, and cereals are a few of the most regularly sold products (Mertz, 2019). The use of digital supply chain technology into Flashfood's distribution model has enabled customers to purchase products from the convenience of their own homes. According to the chief executive officer of Flashfood, Josh Domingues, the software functions like a discount food rack on a shopper's mobile phone, with features that allow consumers to view the products they intend to purchase and assess their condition prior to making a purchase (Chubb, 2016). The data is accessible on a centralized platform that maximizes efficiency.

Source of Food Remaining

Grocery stores are the primary distributors of Flashfood's products. They offer the business with things that would otherwise be discarded if there were no other way to leverage their utility. Flashfood packages and sells these items at a discount. Due to the fact that the majority of the produce sold was gotten at little or no cost, there is typically a 50% discount on the selling price, allowing the company to easily maintain sales (Flashfood Inc., 2019). Flashfood has not only developed a sustainable business model through these trade practices, but it has also reduced its carbon footprint by conducting lean operations.

Partners/ Supply Chain Participants

Flashfood's primary markets are Canada and the United States. The company's primary partner in the United States is Meijer and Hy-Vee supermarkets, which have over 246 physical locations where customers can pick up their purchases (Martinko, 2020). SpartanNash (2020) is a further important partner in the US market that supports Flashfood's operations from its Byron Center, Michigan headquarters. Because its primary business is grocery distribution, the company is a natural fit with Flashfood. According to the company's website, it is the fifth-largest distributor of groceries in the United States (US) (SpartanNash Company, 2020). Its distribution network consists of 155 corporate-owned retail outlets and over 2,000 independent distribution locations (SpartanNash Company, 2020). The company is responsible for the majority of Flashfood's sales on the US market.

In Canada, Flashfood and Loblaws have teamed to open actual retail locations in Quebec and other regions. The partner operates a number of corporate and independently owned stores that employ approximately 2,000 individuals (Loblaw Companies Limited, 2020). Based on this collaboration, Flashfood has established a solid distribution infrastructure across Canada.

Collection Centres

Flashfood's extensive distribution network includes collecting points in Michigan and Wisconsin. These centres serve as operational hubs for the company's broad global operations, which are located in Egypt, Colombia, Europe, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Bahrain, and Djibouti, among others (SpartanNash Company, 2020). The majority of Fashfood's products are collected dry or refrigerated through strategic collaborations with other firms, including Loblaws, Meijer, Hy-Vee, and SpartanNash.

Important Logistics and Physical Distribution Obstacles

The Flashfood app relies heavily on the provision of a dependable digital infrastructure that enables users to complete all required purchasing procedures, just as they would in a real store. As emphasized in this study, the company's product line includes a variety of items sold at a discount or as specialized items. The collaboration between Flashfood and its primary North American partners, Canada and the United States, is currently under review in order to determine new ways to expand the current distribution network beyond North America (Loblaw Companies Limited, 2020). However, the durability of this digital infrastructure to handle such growth has been questioned, as customers have complained of a number of software difficulties that either prevent them from making purchases or hinder the shopping process (Flashfood Inc., 2019). Some customers have experienced erroneous location settings on their apps, unverifiable quantities on their tabs, and the inability to locate their desired location (distribution) locations on the map (Flashfood Inc., 2019). The technically of the app's functionality has therefore been questioned.

These difficulties have hindered some customers from having a positive purchasing experience. In addition, they have made it challenging to demonstrate the economic feasibility of Flashfood's business model, which is dependent on the app's proper functionality. Aragie, Balié, and MoralesOpazo (2018) highlight the necessity to develop economically feasible food waste management solutions, but app crashes threaten to undermine this core principle of business management. This issue emphasizes the requirement for a waste management plan that is devoid of the idiosyncrasies of faulty virtual distribution models (Vinck, Scheelen and Du Bois, 2019). From a logistical standpoint, app crashes and malfunctions will cause a bottleneck in product delivery, which may have far-reaching effects on various levels of the distribution system.

The connection between the aforementioned app concerns and Flashfood's distribution system may be assessed further by analyzing the aspects that influence the performance of distribution network design. Typically, this review is conducted in two dimensions. The first entails satisfying the needs of customers, which is regarded as the "guiding principle" of the entire logistics and distribution strategy. The second is the expense of satisfying client requirements through increased efficiency and efficacy. Flashfood has a strong performance on the second metric because its lean supply chain strategy ensures that products are delivered to clients quickly and on time. However, the app's dependability issues undercut the first evaluation criterion, which is meeting client requirements.

Concerns over the proper handling of food and the likelihood that some consumers would fall ill after consuming spoiled product have hampered Flashfood's physical distribution operations. This risk originates from the types of goods distributed by Fastfood, which are typically perishable and must be refrigerated within precise temperature ranges; otherwise, contamination may develop (Flashfood Inc., 2019). This difficulty generates a "liability barrier" in the physical distribution network of the organization, which may have long-term effects on its operational activities.


As previously mentioned, a practical issue with Flashfood's operations is the main app's frequent crashing. As suggested by Huawei, this issue might be resolved by adding a tertiary information collection layer to the current system, which would correct crash error reports and forward them to the company's IT department for rectification (2020). This tertiary layer of cognition will function similarly to an alarm in that it will alert the company of outstanding issues, but it will be more accurate in identifying the issue than simply reporting it. This detection system pertains to the internal mechanism of Flashfood's operations, but it also appeals to the general waste management concepts established by Welch, Swaffield, and Evans (2018), which recommend that all supply chain players should assume responsibility for their duties. In accordance with this criterion, Flashfood shall encourage customers to provide an email address or phone number to be contacted regarding the status of their error reports. Therefore, they will have sufficient knowledge of what transpired and what can be done to resolve the issue. This solution addresses the requirement for a dependable and effective communication channel between the firm and its consumers to keep the latter group informed of the company's attempts to address their problems.

To solve the potential issues related with the safe handling of food outlined in section 2.1, the company could have its clients sign a liability waiver form releasing it from the need to pay for damages resulting from the eating of dangerous food. This proposal stems from the 1996 Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, which protects businesses and individuals that donate or distribute food in good faith (Feeding America, 2020). Similar legal protections should be pursued in the United Kingdom and other markets. Europe is currently modernizing some of its food safety and distribution legislation to improve food waste management service delivery (UK Parliament, 2020). While it may be sensible to seek legal protection against such situations, Flashfood's extreme negligence may warrant certain exclusions. This layer of protection against the company's incompetence will instill confidence in the company's logistics and distribution system operators, reducing their fear of being sued and allowing them to operate more efficiently. Flashfood will continue to play a crucial role in lowering the amount of food waste sent to landfills and providing access to affordable groceries for more customers throughout the world by utilizing such robust systems. According to Wang and Stanisavljevic (2019), who relate food waste management systems to the global drive for improved environmental management, this approach will contribute to a reduction in the effects of climate change. Flashfood's supply chain model will contribute to this progress by enhancing the sharing economy's food waste distribution management.


Achinas, S., and Euverink, G. J. W., "Elevated biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of farmhouse waste: insight into the process performance and kinetics," Waste Management and Research, 37(12), pp. 1240-1249, 2019. Aragie, E., Balié, J. and Morales Does it make economic sense to reduce food losses and wastes in sub-Saharan Africa?, Waste Management and Research, 36(6), pp. 483-494, 2018. Baron, S., et al. (2018). "Feed people first: a service ecosystem perspective on innovative food waste reduction." Journal of Service Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135-150. City News, Chubb, C. (2016). "The Flashfood app will allow you to purchase surplus food at a discount." Valorization of the organic part of municipal solid waste. Waste Management and Research 37(1): 59-73, 2019. Feeding America (2020): safeguarding our food suppliers. Flashfood Inc. (2019) Flashfood on the Web. Grosso, M., and Falasconi, L. (2018). "Addressing food waste in the context of the United Nations' sustainable development goals," Waste Management and Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 97-98. Development of Huawei's AppGallery connect crash service in 2020. Loblaw Companies Limited Website (2020) About ourselves. Longjan, G. G., and Dehouche, Z. (2018). "Nutrient characterisation and bioenergy potential of common Nigerian food wastes," Waste Management and Research, vol. 36, issue 5, pp. 426-435. Martinko, K. (2020). Canadian grocers' attitude to food waste is astute. Mertz, E. (2019). Web. Mertz, E. (2019). "Flashfood app offers discounts on expiring food items, reduces waste," Global News. Muoz, P., and Cohen, B. (2018). "A compass for navigating sharing economy business models," California Management Review, 61(1):114-147. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24(1), pp. 45-57. Pearson, D., and A. Perera. 2018. "Reducing food waste: a practitioner guide identifying requirements for an integrated social marketing communication campaign." Expanding the lens of food well-being: a study of contemporary marketing, policy, and practice with an eye toward the future. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 38(2), pp. 127-135. Spartannash Company (2020) profile of the company. Swinburne, M., and Sandson, K. (2019). Food waste: solving our 160 billion-pound public health crisis through policy and commercial initiatives. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(2), pp. 100-104. British Parliament (2020) Counting the cost of food waste: EU food waste prevention committee. Vinck, K., L. Scheelen, and E. Du Bois. "Design opportunities for organic waste recycling in urban restaurants." Waste Management and Research, 37(1), pp. 40-50. Wang, X., & Stanisavljevic, N. (2019). "Can waste management be recognized as a leader in climate change mitigation?" Waste Management and Research, 37(12), 1181-1182. Who's to Blame for Food Waste? Journal of Consumer Culture, volume 4, number 1, pages 1-10, "Consumers, retailers, and the food waste discourse coalition in the United Kingdom"

[supanova question]

We Offer Fast, Confidential Essay Help Services

  • Custom writing services – Essays and Research Papers
  • Full or part dissertations
  • Reports, book and movie reviews
  • Proofreading, critiquing and editing
  • Power point presentations, cover letter and resumes
  • Any other academic work

Here’s how it works: You send us the essay question…we send you the custom answer for your question. It’s that simple! We can also help you with custom research papers and term papers or any other writing that you need.

If you have already written something, but not sure whether it will work, we can help you improve. All work is undertaken by an expert writer with English as their first language, qualified and experienced in your area of study and assigned by our Quality Assurance team to match your assignment.

We understand how frustrating it can be for students to do well in all subjects and achieve high grades with all the responsibilities you may have while studying.

Every single student experiences these difficulties in one way or the other. To ensure that the time & money you invest in your academics don’t go to waste, you need to make sure you have all the support and help you need to complete your assignments successfully.

We are here to support you and to help you achieve more

Guaranteed quality work, written by your qualified expert…

Your work is….

  • written to your choice of undergraduate or post graduate level
  • written to your exact specifications
  • written by a qualified expert in your area of study
  • fully researched and referenced

We deliver your work confidentially. In a rush? Don’t worry, we can help in as little as 3 hours.

The work we deliver is written to a quality standard of your choice, and fully guaranteed. Unlike any other services, we offer a custom written and original paper for the first time. If your work meets the quality standard but you’re unhappy with anything else, you can request changes which will be delivered to you in 24 hours or sooner.

Essay Writing at 247 Essay Help

4.9 rating based on 10,005 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10005 reviews

Review This Service