RESEARCH SOLUTION PROPOSAL (mood disorders)
Explain the controversy or problem, as you understand it. Establish common ground between your perspectives. END WITH A THESIS THAT STATES YOUR SOLUTION.Proposal: Explain the steps of your solution. What, specifically, do we need to do to solve this problem? Why will your solution work? How is your solution feasible? Be specific here and support your claims with examples and evidence. Counterargument: Examine your opposition’s main arguments and refute them. Directly address their claims and positions on the issue that are counter to your solution, and then argue against those claims. Give direct support for your rebuttal argumentsConclusion: Synthesize your main arguments. Re-establish common ground, and let your reader know what you want them to do, think, or feel after reading your essay. What are your reader’s next step? *USE 4-5 CREDIBLE SOURCES*
List three old champions of your creative self-worth: (3 pages)
Be specific. Every encouraging word counts. Even if you disbelieve a compliment, record it. Think of people who have pushed you and work forward. These could be teachers, family members, friends, or anyone who has influenced your path and decisions.
Writing Assignment Help Prompt: During the seventh week of the course, you will respond to several questions in the webtext as you complete each learning block. At the end of Module Seven, you will review your answers to these questions and ensure that you have responded to each question. It is important that you answer each question; otherwise, the words “[no response]” will appear in brackets when you submit the assignment. The questions and their original locations in the webtext are listed in this table in case you want to refer back to the reading as you edit, but you can edit your responses to all the questions directly in Module Seven: Thinking About History, learning block 7-4 (page 4) in the webtext, before exporting to Word for submission to your instructor in your learning environment.Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-1 (page 2):• Question 1: Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers.• Question 2: Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence.Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-2 (page 2):• Question 3: Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.• Question 4: Massasoit’s decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)• Question 5: Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-3 (page 3):• Question 6: How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-4 (page 2):• Question 7: Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.• Question 8: Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: “The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it.” Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.RubricGuidelines for Submission: Your response to Question 1 should be no more than 1 sentence in length. Your responses to Questions 2, 6, 7, and 8 should be 2–3 sentences in length. Your responses to Questions 3, 4, and 5 should be 1–2 sentences in length.
Amicus Brief Project
When capital punishment cases reach a court of last resort, interest groups, members of government, and other stakeholders often seek to provide input for the justices’ consideration in the form of amicus briefs. Your task for this project will be to put yourself in the shoes of one of those stakeholders and argue either for or against the exercise of capital punishment. While I do not expect you to conduct the legal research that would be required in “real-world” amicus briefing, below is a list of components that may provide for a successful assignment:A description of the role you are taking on (i.e. advocacy group, member of the government, victim’s family member, law enforcement, etc.);A brief review of the most important historical developments in the use of capital punishment;A synthesis of court cases that would support your chosen position and why they do so;A synthesis of court cases that would not support your chosen position and why your position is better supported;Applicable social science research; andProper use of grammar, formatting, and signposts that make it easy for the reader to know your position.What structure should you generally follow?• Title pageo The examples all have a first page that follows a set format. I do not expect nor do I want you to use that format.o You should use an APA-formatted title page. Give me the essentials there: name, date, etc.• Table of contentso You will see the following categories on many of the tables of contents. I’ll work through those in turn. Those, of course, are also in the order in which they would best be placed in the body of the brief.o I do not need page numbers for subcategories unless you will work better including them.o Table of authorities? This is essentially your reference page. I would like you to put it up front as the examples have them.? Typical subdivisions are cases, statutes, scientific/professional publications, and other. Using those subdivisions would be good.? Use APA formatting for those citations. At this point, you should be able to incorporate that formatting and you will be held responsible for accuracy.o Interest of amicus curiae? This is where you would describe the role you are choosing for the brief. No more than a couple of sentences. Expand slightly on what you included in the summary.o Background? This one is a little less necessary for our purposes. It is essentially a statement of the facts of the case. I’m not expecting you to come up with a full scenario unless you want to.o Arguments? This is where you will explain, well, your arguments on why your chosen position on capital punishment should prevail. You’ll notice that the example briefs have headings for each individual argument, followed by the explanation and evidence.? What does case law say about how capital punishment is treated in similarly situated cases as yours?? What does the scientific evidence say about how capital punishment is treated in similarly situated cases as yours?? Be compelling. Be creative. Be accurate.? You are welcome to structure your arguments in whatever way you believe best communicates your desired perspective, though organization is definitely a good idea and this structure would not be a bad choice.? Use APA in-text citation format. Consult the resources I’ve provided on D2L or the APA manual I strongly suggested in the syllabus for assistance.o Conclusion? The briefs will conclude with a short and simple statement of the amicus’ desired outcome(s), no more than one or two sentences.
” Now, create your own ending and write G. In a separate paragraph, tell me how you think about the story and why you wrote the ending you wrote. Make sure to support your observations with quotes from the texts.
Demographics and Technology
Review the demographic and technological information about your company to complete the activity below. If the information is not public, base your decisions on a similar company and research.Create an outline that conveys the information in the following format:DemographicsWhat are the current demographics? (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity, etc.)What was a recent change?How did the company handle it?Was the change handled ethically? If not, how should they have handled it? If it was, what stands out as something to emulate in your future business endeavors?TechnologyHow does the company utilize technology in day-to-day business?What types of technology are used?How does a change of technology affect the organization?Cite all sources.Format your citations according to APA guidelines. Utilize the Center for Writing Excellence and the Reference and Citation Generator for assistance with APA style formatting.